Prime Minister Modi Inspecting Guard of Honour

Prime Minister Modi Inspecting Guard of Honour
ALL VETERANS ARE REQUESTED TO CONTRIBUTE RS.1000/- to 5000/- FOR THE CAUSE OF TABLE 7 & 8 FIGHT IN SUPREME COURT. Account Number - 465010110009039 Beneficiary Name - Air Force Association Muzaffarpur Chapter Bihar Branch Bank Name - Bank of India Branch Name :- MUZAFFARPUR IFSC Code :- BKID0004650

Monday, March 3, 2014

Terms of Reference of 7th Central Pay Commission (CPC)

The Union Cabinet today gave its approval to the Terms of Reference of 7th Central Pay Commission (CPC) as follows:-

a)      To examine, review, evolve and recommend changes that are desirable and feasible regarding the principles that should govern the emoluments structure including pay, allowances and other facilities/benefits, in cash or kind, having regard to rationalization and simplification therein as well as the specialized needs of various Departments, agencies and services, in respect of the following categories of employees:-
i. Central Government employees-industrial and non-industrial
ii. Personnel belonging to the All India Services;
iii. Personnel of the Union Territories;
iv. Officers  and   employees   of  the   Indian  Audit  and   Accounts Department;
v. Members of regulatory bodies (excluding the Reserve Bank of India) set up under Acts of Parliament; and
vi. Officers and employees of the Supreme Court.
b) To examine, review, evolve and recommend changes that are desirable and feasible regarding principles that should govern the emoluments structure, concessions and facilities/benefits, in cash or kind, as well as retirement benefits of personnel belonging to the Defence Forces, having regard to historical and traditional parities, with due emphasis on aspects unique to these personnel.
c)  To work out the framework for an emoluments structure linked with the need to attract the most suitable talent to Government service, promote efficiency, accountability and responsibility in the work culture, and foster excellence in the public governance system to respond to complex challenges of modern administration and rapid political, social, economic and technological changes, with due regard to expectations of stakeholders, and to recommend appropriate training and capacity building through a competency based framework.
d)  To examine the existing schemes of payment of bonus, keeping in view, among other things, its bearing upon performance and productivity and make recommendations on the general principles, financial parameters and conditions for an appropriate incentive scheme to reward excellence in productivity, performance and integrity.
e)  To review the variety of existing    allowances presently available to employees in addition to pay and suggest their rationalization and simplification, with a view to ensuring that the pay structure is so designed as to take these into account.

f)  To examine the principles which should govern the structure of pension and other retirement benefits, including revision of pension in the case of employees who have retired prior to the date of effect of these recommendations, keeping in view that retirement benefits of all Central Government employees appointed on and after 01.01.2004 are covered by the New Pension Scheme (NPS).

g)  To make recommendations on the above, keeping in view:

i. the economic conditions in the country  and need for fiscal prudence;
ii. the need to ensure that adequate resources are available for developmental expenditures and welfare measures;
iii. the likely impact of the recommendations on the finances of the State Governments, which usually adopt the recommendations with some modifications;
iv.  the prevailing emolument structure and retirement benefits available to employees of Central Public Sector Undertakings; and
v. the best global practices and their adaptability and relevance in Indian conditions.
h)  To recommend the date of effect of its recommendations on all the above.
The Commission will make its recommendations within 18 months of the date of its constitution.  It may consider, if necessary, sending interim reports on any of the matters as and when the recommendations are finalised.
The decision will result in the benefit of improved pay and allowances as well as rationalization of the pay structure in case of Central Government employees and other employees included in the scope of the 7th Central Pay Commission.
Background
Central Pay Commissions are periodically constituted to go into various issues of emoluments’ structure, retirement benefits and other service conditions of Central Government employees and to make recommendations on the changes required.
(Source-PIB)

Monday, February 17, 2014

SOME IMPORTANT RELIEFS IN BUDGET 14-15 FOR EX-SERVICEMEN

ONE RANK ONE PENSION

56.       Hon’ble Members are aware of the long standing demand of the Defence Services for One Rank One Pension (OROP).  It is an emotive issue, it has legal implications, and it has to be handled with great sensitivity.   During the tenure of the UPA Governments, changes in the pension rules applicable to the defence services were notified on three occasions in 2006, 2010 and 2013.  As a result, the gap between pre-2006 retirees and post-2006 retirees has been closed in four ranks (subject to some anomalies that are being addressed): Havildar, Naib Subedar, Subedar and Subedar Major.  There is still a small gap in the ranks of Sepoy and Naik and a gap in the ranks of Major and above.  We need a young fighting force, we need young jawans, and we need young officers.  We also need to take care of those who served in the defence forces only for a limited number of years.  Government has therefore decided to walk the last mile and close the gap for all retirees in all ranks.  I am happy to announce that Government has accepted the principle of One Rank One Pension for the defence forces.  This decision will be implemented prospectively from the financial year 2014-15.  The requirement for 2014-15 is estimated at `500 crore and, as an earnest of the UPA Government’s commitment, I propose to transfer a sum of `500 crore to the Defence Pension Account in the current financial year itself.

EDUCATION LOANS

64.       Hon’ble Members will recall that my predecessor, Shri Pranab Mukherjee, had, in the Budget of 2009-10, introduced the Central Scheme for Interest Subsidy (CSIS) in respect of education loans disbursed after 1.4.2009 under which Government took over the burden of interest for the duration of the period of study and a little beyond.  The scheme brought great cheer to student-borrowers and their families.  However, I have noticed a sense of discrimination among students who had borrowed before 31.3.2009, struggled to pay interest during the period of study, and continued to service the loans afterwards.  I think they deserve some relief.  I therefore propose a moratorium period for all education loans taken up to 31.3.2009 and outstanding on 31.12.2013.  Government will take over the liability for outstanding interest as on 31.12.2013, but the borrower would have to pay interest for the period after 1.1.2014.  It is estimated that nearly 9 lakh student borrowers will benefit to the tune of approximately `2,600 crore.  I intend to provide the funds in the current financial year itself.  Accordingly, a sum of `2,600 crore will be transferred to the Canara Bank, the designated CSIS banker.  Details of the scheme will be announced shortly. 

One rank one pension from apr 2014 just announced by FM in Budget

ONE RANK ONE PENSION IS ANNOUNCED BY SRI. CHIDAMBARAM THE HON'BLE FINANCE MINISTER TODAY IN HIS BUDGET SPEECH. THIS WILL BE EFFICTIVE FROM 1.4.2014. SINCE HE EXPRESSED FURTHER BRIDGING GAP BETWEEN PRE-2006 AND POST-2006, WE MAY GET LITTLE MORE THAN WHAT IS GIVEN EARLIER BUT NOT THE REAL OROP.

Wednesday, February 12, 2014

Defence Minister withdraws controversial circular ordaining en masse litigation against military veterans ( posted on Indianmilitary.info)

This is in reference to the post of 12 January 2014 in which it had been pointed out that the Department of Ex-Servicemen Welfare (DESW) of the Ministry of Defence (MoD) had issued a letter ordaining en masse appeals in the Supreme Court against judicial verdicts rendered by Courts in favour of military veterans without seeking legal opinion on individual cases. The MoD had also officially admitted that it had filed appeals against disabled soldiers in the Supreme Court in ‘almost all types of cases’.

Mr Rajeev Chandrasekhar of Bangalore, Member of Parliament, had consequently taken up the issue with Mr AK Antony through a letter endorsed on 18 January 2014 followed by another one on 28 January 2014. Now the Raksha Mantri has informed Mr Chandrasekhar that the controversial circular is being withdrawn.

The defence of Mr Antony (though I am sure not his own, but of one of the Under Secretaries of the DESW) in the said matter is interesting. He says that the letter had been issued to simplify decision-making.

Mr Antony, decision-making on what? Of filing ruthless appeals against your own disabled veterans? You wanted to simplify the process of unleashing legal terror on the defenders of your own nation?

Though the circular stands withdrawn, it would be otiose to expect any positive change on ground.


The sadism shall continue unabated till the time the higher bureaucracy and the political executive apply their minds properly to the problems at hand without blindly affixing initials on noting sheets put up from below. 

/

Tuesday, February 4, 2014

Justice Mathur to head 7th Central Pay Commission

     Former Supreme Court Judge Ashok Kumar Mathur will head the seventh Pay Commission, which will revise salaries of over 50 lakh Central government employees and remuneration of 30 lakh pensioners.

“The Prime Minister has approved the composition of the 7th Central Pay Commission,” the Finance Ministry said in a statement on Tuesday.
“The Prime Minister has approved the composition of the 7th Central Pay Commission,” the Finance Ministry said in a statement on Tuesday.
“The Prime Minister has approved the composition of the 7th Central Pay Commission,” the Finance Ministry said in a statement on Tuesday.
The announcement for composition of the Commission comes ahead of imposition of model conduct which would come into force once the schedule for the general election due in April-May is notified.
The Retired Supreme Court Judge, who had also headed the Armed Forces Tribunal, has been appointed chairman of the Commission.
The Commission has been mandated to submit its report in two years time and its recommendations would be implemented from January 1, 2016.
The other members of the Commission, include, Oil Secretary Vivek Rae (full time member), NIPFP Director Rathin Roy (part-time Member) and OSD in Expenditure Department Meena Agarwal (Secretary).
Earlier in September 2013, the Prime Minister had approved setting up of the 7th Pay Commission.
The recommendations of the Commission will benefit about 50 lakh central government employees, including those in defence and railways, and about 30 lakh pensioners.
The government constitutes Pay Commission almost every ten years to revise the pay scales of its employees and often these are adopted by states after some modification.
The sixth Pay Commission was implemented with effect from January 1,2006, the fifth from January 1, 1996 and fourth from January 1, 1986.

Friday, January 31, 2014

Ex-Airman T.ravi Kumar Murthy is now Superintendent of Police

T.Ravi Kumar Murthy  IPS
Superintendent of Police
T.Ravi Kumar Murthy was in in Air Force as Work Shop Fitter of 117 intake at Tambaram. After serving in Air Force for 8 years he joined in  Bank as Probationary Officer. He was selected as Dy S.P. of A.P.Police in the year 1992 and became SP in 2011.He is likely to become DIG within a year. Presently he is working as Superintendent of Police Rajhamundry Urban. Andhra Pradesh.

We the Ex-Servicemen  fraternity wishes him a success in the life


Clarifications on ECHS CARD UPGRADING:

Dear All

I am reproducing mail received from Central Organization ECHS clarifying certain issued raised with them recently.

I would like to thank the MD and his team for being so prompt in accepting our point of view and responding positively.

Thank you Gen George and all your team.

Pathak

Dear Sir,
We in ECHS Central Organisation are receiving reports from veterans that undermentioned aspects are being highlighted by various Ex Servicemen Associations alongwith clarifications against each :-
(a) Inclusion of UID in ECHS Application Form. Clarification : This is Not Compulsory.
(b) Deposit of ECHS Cards while applying for Upgraded Cards. Clarification : This policy on deposit of ECHS Cards while applying for Upgraded Cards has been reverted. Now ESM have to carry their New Cards with the Old Cards to ECHS Polyclinic for registration where the Old Card will be deposited.
(c) Compulsory Upgradations from 16 kb Card to 32 Kb Card and to be done before 01 Jan 2014. Clarification : There is no such compulsion and where ESM finds that the Card Text is not readable or the Biometric check is not working for the card, the same may be changed through existing process.

You are requested to please give the above inputs to all veterans so as to avoid any confusion.

Cdr Ravindra Waman Pathak I.N. (Retd)

Member Governing Body and Pension Cell

Indian Ex Servicemen Movement

JOB OPPORTUNITY TO EX-SERVICEMEN

M/s. Aurobindo Pharma requires Security Managers(only ex-servicemen). Salary will be 25-30 thousand. Should be fluent in English. Probably the jobs are in Hyderabad & Andhra Pradesh. Interested Ex-Servicemen are required to apply to HRABI@AUROBINDO.COM OR HUDHA@AUROBINDO.COM with full bio data or contact 040-39325000 

Thursday, December 12, 2013

MiG-21 the first supersonic retired from its operational services



It was an emotional moment as people watched, amidst firing Zon guns, three MiG-27 aircraft perform the Trishul Break manoeuvre at the Kalaikunda airbase in West Midnapore Wednesday as a salute to a MiG-21 type 77 (FL) aircraft that was towed to the hangar for the last time.
The operational conversion unit here bade a final farewell to its oldest workhorse after five decades of service as the fleet of MiG-21 FL fighters was officially phased out.
For years, the IAF has depended on MiG aircraft, which also took part in the 1971 war.
Before Air Chief Marshal NAK Browne received form 700, the document log of the aircraft, he delivered a speech wherein he said that the end of nearly five decades of remarkable operational service by the iconic fighter was a watershed moment in the history of the Indian Air Force.
"No wonder, five generations of combat pilots, including myself, who have cut teeth on this veritable fighter swear by its unmatched prowess. Around 80 per cent of the serving fighter IAF aircrew have flown the T-77 and 90 per cent one of the MiG variants," Browne said, adding that "the T-77 may have completed its last sortie today but its imprint on the operational DNA of the IAF will continue for a long time. Gradually, the other variants of MiG-21 will also retire.
Group Captain T K Singha said the 15 MiG-21s that the fleet had were used for combat and training fighter pilots.
"Now, these would serve as decorative pieces or gate guardians. Some of those would also be sent to aeronautical and engineering institutes for students to study and understand the physics of the mean machines while the trainer aircraft would be sent to the Bison squadron," he said. Singha added that the replacement was yet to be decided.

I HAVE SERVED IN MiG-21 SQUADRONS FROM 1985 to 1991. ONE OF THE THE MOST EFFICIENT AIRCRAFT OF THE INDIAN AIR FORCE. EVEN AFTER 22 YEARS I LEFT THE AIR FORCE, I FEEL ITS A GREAT LOSS TO THE NATION. I AM HAPPY TO KNOW THE AIRCRAFT IS BEING UTILISED FOR TRAINING PURPOSE FOR THE NEW ENTRANTS IN TO AIR FORCE.

Thursday, November 21, 2013

SUPREME COURT ISSUED NOTICE TO PENSIONERS IN 3SLP FILED BY UOI

SUPREME COURT ISSUED NOTICES TO RESPONDENTS 

(PENSIONERS ) IN 3 SLP FILED BY UOI  ON 19/11/2013 

AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT OF CAT PB & DELHI HIGH 

COURT.

THE DATE OF  HEARING WILL BE ANNOUNCED SHORTLY AFTER  THE REPLY TO NOTICES ARE RECEIVED BY THE COURT.THERE IS NO PLACE FOR ANY DISAPPOINTMENT 
SINCE THIS WONT AFFECT THE CONTEMPT PETITION 
WHICH IS COMING UP FOR HEARING IN CAT PB 
ON 27/11/2013

Sunday, November 17, 2013

THE REVIEW PETITION FILED BY UOI IN SUPREME COURT IS DISMISSED

The review petition RP(civil) 2492/2013 filed by UOI in SUPREME COURT  against the dismissal of SLP(c) 23055/2013 is againdismissed as there is  no fresh case is made out to review the order dated 29th July 2013.The judgement is reproduced below.                      
             IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NO.2492 OF 2013
                   IN
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.23055 OF 2013
         U.O.I. & ANR...PETITIONERS
                             VERSUS
    CENTRAL GOVT. SAG (S-29)    &ANR....RESPONDENTS          
                               ORDER
This Review Petition has been filed against
order, dated 29thJuly, 2013, whereby the Special
Leave Petition was dismissed.
                          Delay condoned.
           Prayer for oral hearing is rejected.
We have perused the Review Petition as well as
the grounds in support of the Review Petition. In
our opinion, no case for review of order, dated
29thJuly, 2013, is made out. Consequently,  
          the review petition is dismissed.
                 .,J.
        (SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR)
                  ,J.
   (FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA)
NEW DELHI
NOVEMBER 12, 2013

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

ON PAY COMMISSIONS - Damaging a Great Institution - BY LT GEN HARWANT SINGH (RETD)

 
THE 6TH CENTRAL PAY COMMISSION, SET UP IN 2006, DISPLAYED COMPLETE LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OF DEFENCE SERVICES, ON WHOSE PAY &ALLOWANCES IT WAS TO DECIDE. THERE ARE STILL MORE THAN TWO DOZEN ANOMALIES IN ITS RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING DEFENCE SERVICES, WHICH AWAIT RESOLUTION 
 
33 YEARS’ SERVICE

The condition of 33 years’ service to earn full pension was introduced,knowing full well that more than 90% of the defence personnel cannot meet this requirement. The 4th CPC created a number of other anomalies which till now have not been resolved.

The 5th CPC took away the running pay band and introduced many more disadvan- tages for the defence personnel. It further lowered the status of defence officers. On persistent protests from the defence services, the bureaucracy (Ajai Vikram Singh Committee), instead of restoring the rank-wise status, altered the very rank structure within the service by creating more vacancies in higher ranks. Thus, we ended up with a Lt Col doing a Major’s jobs, resulting in six to seven Lt Cols in a unit, besides the commanding officer of colonel rank. The same pattern was adopted right up to the rank of Lt Gens. In some manner, this cheapening of the rank did contribute to the problems that have surfaced in units during the past year or so. This has been the handiwork of the bureaucracy, bugged as it had been with the earlier status of armed forces officers vis-à-vis the bureaucracy, police etc. Higher command in the defence forces, unable to oppose this damage to the service, acquiesced to this mischief.

ANOMALIES GALORE
 
The 6th CPC did away with rank pay and displayed complete lack of knowledge of defence services, on whose pay, allowances etc., it was to decide. It thought that a brigadier is of a higher rank than a Maj Gen and consequently gave the former higher pension! It took nearly six years to partially sort out this issue by taking the case right up to the Supreme Court. There are still more than two dozen anomalies in its recommendations concerning defence services, which await resolution.

However, the biggest mischief of this CPC has been the exclusion of defence officers from what is called Non-Functional Upgradation ( NFU), which means that once an IAS officer, say with 14 years’ service, becomes a joint secretary to the union government, then all, yes all officers, in grade A central service with 16 years of service will get elevated to an equivalent status in terms of pay etc. There are more than 50 class-A central services. Army officers are not in class-A central service, it is military service as designated by the bureaucracy. The issue of NFU for the defence services is being left for the 7th CPC to decide, which of course should not be accepted. Hopefully, army commanders (and those in the air force and the navy) will, in writing, apprise the defence minister of the damage such policies are inflicting on the services.

NO REPRESENTATION

No CPC had a member from the defence services, while theirs is the largest officer cadre and nearly 40% of central employees are from the armed forces. There has never been a defence member even among the staff of more than 150 officers assembled to work out the nitty-gritty of various CPC reports. The 5th CPC’s report runs into 2,100 pages in three volumes, where less than 50 pages deal with the defence services.

The government has succeeded in making the service so very unattractive that few suitable candidates want to join it and many of those in service want to quit. During 2001-04, 2,000 officers applied to leave service and that included two Lt Gens, 10 Maj Gens, 84 brigadiers and the rest colonels and below. How many from the IAS, IPS and other central services have opted to leave? Looking at the number of mutinies in units in recent times and the increasing number of cases of suicides and fratricides, even the dumb-witted can make out the impact these developments will have on national security. The British took more than a century to create a worldclass military, while we have succeeded in inflicting much damage to this great institution within a much shorter period. Winston Churchill spelt out the time and the type of effort required to restore the spirit and morale of an army.

The 7th CPC must have a member from the services and sufficient number among the staff that prepares the report. The issue of NFU for the defence services and other anomalies need to be decided now and not left to the 7th CPC.

Tuesday, November 12, 2013

AN INSPIRING STORY OF EX-AIR VETERAN


Hon'ble Justice H.R.Panwar (Retd)

The best second inning ever played by an Ex Airman…Inspiring story..
Justice H R Panwar (retd) Ex Corporal, Borne on 11.02.1948 and enrolled as Advocate of High Court of Rajastan on 01.02.1982 and appointed as Judge of Rajastan High Court on 11.01.2001.

Friends, I came to know him somewhere in 1980. He was a Corporal of Clk/Acct. We were sweating together at AF Jodhpur that time. We almost used to see each other daily because of location of work place. He completed his LLB from Jodhpur University just before his discharge from AF in 1982 and quickly changed his uniform from khaki to balck & white (IAF was Khaki then). His attractive personality with good physic and always charming smile on face made him a different person. He started his practice as a lawyer in High Court Jodhpur and soon became a popular person among our folk. Many Ex airmen from Jodhpur followed his footsteps and adopted the same profession and are now successful lawyers.
By his hard work, helping nature and with the blessing of people he was appointed as a Judge in High Court ,Jodhpur in the year 2002. He retired in the year 2010 after 62 years and leading very peaceful life with a lot of respect in the society now. No doubt he added glory to ex-airmen class as a whole.
I met him on the eve of this Diwali at his home. He narrated many inspiring stories of his tenure as a judge to me. It was a wonderful experience to listen him.
…...Is there anybody else who has played second inning like him? Bring him out. People need inspiration.
By 
Having worked in Jodhpur from 1978 to 1983 as Corporal, I feel proud of having worked with him during my tenure in Jodhpur. I convey my thanks to  Sri. Nathu Singh Choudhary to bring his inspired story to notice of our fraternity.

P.Vigneshwar Raju
Ex-Sergeant
Supdt. of Customs & Central Excise. 

Monday, November 4, 2013

HEARING OF SLP FILED BY UOI FOR ADMISSION DEFERRED BY TWO WEEKS

The review petition filed by UOI against CAT PB judgement in  OA 655/2010 & DELHI HIGH COURT judgement  WP(civil) 1535/2012 in SUPREME COURT is listed to be heard on 12/11/2013.

 The fresh SLP in pre2006 pensioners 
case filed by UOI against CAT PB & DELHI HIGH COURT JUDGEMENT IN SUPREME COURT , which is listed to be heard on 01/11/2013  is now deferred by two weeks & the next date of hearing will be on 15/11/2013.

ON PUBLIC REQUEST THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT JUDGEMENT IS POSTED AGAIN HERE

SALARY HIKE TO MPS, ONE RANK, ONE PENSION

SALARY HIKE TO MPS, ONE RANK, ONE PENSION
Letter to Hon'ble Prime Minister by Hon'ble M.P.

Page-2

Ex-Servicemen return Medals