I am of d opinion that over d time employees status hv been pushed up apart from pay for other gov servants save pbors of afs. D Inspector of police was raised to cl 1 in d home depts. D jcos of afs r discriminated against by successive pay commissions. D gr. Pay in respect of tech airmen grossly undervalued to civ counterparts. Even a Lt./ fg offr's pension is in d range of 20k though no offr retires as so for they r guarded by timescale. D poor jco is poorly represented to b contented with 10-13k for a service le gth of 28 yrs. Holistically, jcos needed to b pensioned at least in lowest of d offr rank. This is not a demand for serving jco, but when pensioned. And accordingly, pension of pbors could b upgraded. Our service hqs r contrarily, in eternal efforts to pull down their men as litigations in cat reveal those. However, we must put forward our cause to one man judicial committee.
2 comments:
I think it is not applicable for PBOR, It is only for Offr and Civlian.
I am of d opinion that over d time employees status hv been pushed up apart from pay for other gov servants save pbors of afs. D Inspector of police was raised to cl 1 in d home depts. D jcos of afs r discriminated against by successive pay commissions. D gr. Pay in respect of tech airmen grossly undervalued to civ counterparts. Even a Lt./ fg offr's pension is in d range of 20k though no offr retires as so for they r guarded by timescale. D poor jco is poorly represented to b contented with 10-13k for a service le gth of 28 yrs. Holistically, jcos needed to b pensioned at least in lowest of d offr rank. This is not a demand for serving jco, but when pensioned. And accordingly, pension of pbors could b upgraded. Our service hqs r contrarily, in eternal efforts to pull down their men as litigations in cat reveal those. However, we must put forward our cause to one man judicial committee.
Post a Comment