tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-465948555057037549.post5557397877850321778..comments2024-03-09T06:38:58.211+05:30Comments on EX-AIRMEN/SNCO-AIRFORCE ARMY AND NAVY : LETTER SUBMITTED TO JUSTICE L.NARSIMHA REDDY COMMISSION ON OROPP.Vigneshwar Rajuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02670571658633663482noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-465948555057037549.post-73589791177913699422016-06-12T20:46:56.147+05:302016-06-12T20:46:56.147+05:30I am of d opinion that over d time employees statu...I am of d opinion that over d time employees status hv been pushed up apart from pay for other gov servants save pbors of afs. D Inspector of police was raised to cl 1 in d home depts. D jcos of afs r discriminated against by successive pay commissions. D gr. Pay in respect of tech airmen grossly undervalued to civ counterparts. Even a Lt./ fg offr's pension is in d range of 20k though no offr retires as so for they r guarded by timescale. D poor jco is poorly represented to b contented with 10-13k for a service le gth of 28 yrs. Holistically, jcos needed to b pensioned at least in lowest of d offr rank. This is not a demand for serving jco, but when pensioned. And accordingly, pension of pbors could b upgraded. Our service hqs r contrarily, in eternal efforts to pull down their men as litigations in cat reveal those. However, we must put forward our cause to one man judicial committee.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16719159291725447767noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-465948555057037549.post-25773206918203916012016-05-17T08:30:16.676+05:302016-05-17T08:30:16.676+05:30I think it is not applicable for PBOR, It is only ...I think it is not applicable for PBOR, It is only for Offr and Civlian.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11913434129211778168noreply@blogger.com